To FCC Chairman Ajit Pai and Commissioners Mike O’Rielly and Brendan Carr:

By rolling back the Lifeline program, you will be eliminating affordable phone and internet-access options for millions of poor people. Low-income families, the elderly, people with disabilities, people living on tribal lands, veterans, people of color and unhoused people all need Lifeline.

There's no reason to move forward with such a cruel and heartless plan. Please leave the FCC’s Lifeline program alone.

    Not ? Click here.

    You will receive periodic updates from Free Press and the Free Press Action Fund. You may unsubscribe at any time.

    Tell the FCC: Leave Lifeline Alone

    The FCC voted along party lines to move forward with its plan to dismantle Lifeline. The FCC’s proposal would rob poor people of affordable phone and internet access and disproportionately impact people of color, seniors, veterans and people with disabilities.

    In moving forward with this heartless proposal, the FCC ignored bipartisan objections from Senate and House leaders who have heard from concerned constituents that this plan would make it difficult for them to search for jobs, advance their education, meet their basic needs and stay informed.

    The Lifeline program provides a modest $9.25 monthly subsidy to most recipients so that millions of poor people can connect to communications services. Yet the FCC’s Republican leadership is doing all it can to jeopardize this program.

    FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan would implement a budget cap on Lifeline — which would arbitrarily limit program participation or slash funding to fully eligible recipients.

    Pai is also floating the possibility of a lifetime benefits cap that would cut off funding for the most vulnerable users, like elderly people and people with disabilities, by limiting the amount of time an individual can use the program. And Pai’s plan would kick more than 70 percent of Lifeline providers out of the program — leaving over 7 million people without internet access and reducing competition. These cuts are just the tip of the iceberg.

    No one is asking for this cruel rollback. And the FCC majority is rationalizing its attack with vague rhetoric about program abuse and fraud.

    The plan to gut Lifeline has drawn objections from Native American tribal leaders, poor people, single moms, unhoused people, people of color, elderly people, victims of natural disasters, veterans and people with disabilities, all of whom would be disproportionately harmed by this extreme proposal.

    When he was confirmed as FCC chairman, Ajit Pai claimed that bridging the digital divide would be a top priority of his administration. Gutting Lifeline would do the exact opposite, leaving more low-income people without access to vital communications services.

    We can’t let this happen: Tell the FCC to drop its plan and leave Lifeline alone.